wisconsin court upholds gps tracking by policeby ryan j. foley.
associated press writer.
2:42 pm cdt, may 7, 2009. madison, wis.. wisconsin police can attach gps to cars to secretly track anybody's movements without obtaining search warrants, an appeals court ruled thursday.
Cameo-d said:
Elsewhere...
The scriptures say there is a BIG HORN and a little horn on this beast.
The little horn is governments; the BIG horn is religions. The church has always directed the politcal movements.....
Lol! This is a beautiful spoof of WT babble. Thank you for the laugh!
i thought the ending was perfect and it damn near had me in tears.
.
Was this the end of the entire series or just this season? I watched the first 3 or 4 seasons then got tired of the show. Could never quite put my finger on it, but it just didn't seem to have the appeal that the first few seasons had.
i am not talking about here!!!
i understand that website owners have the right to run their sites as they see fit.
not talking about that.. i'm talking about government or political censorship.
He does seem to be saying that it would be a good thing to have children watch their parents have sex and to have open toilets. In his previous sentence he said that this is "totally natural" and that "religion has corrupted sex." I wonder if he invites his children to watch him have sex. After all, he says that it is "totally natural."
i am not talking about here!!!
i understand that website owners have the right to run their sites as they see fit.
not talking about that.. i'm talking about government or political censorship.
WTWizard said:
In places where religion is not a factor, children are able to watch their parents having sex, and toilets are in the open, and no one seems to be adversely affected.
Ummm, do you feel deprived that you couldn't watch your parents screw? Is that what athiests long for, to watch their parents take a dump?
on a previous posting i suggested that i have experienced post-traumatic stress disorders due to my jw upbringing.
feedback has been mixed.
some agree with my assessment, others suggest a misdiagnosis on my part.. please allow me to be more specific concerning actual events that led to my usage of that trerm:.
What are your symptoms?
things become very surreal.............not many details for me....but i did cross center lane.....and nearly died in a head on..........you?.
In my younger days, in the Navy, I would work all day and party all night - literally. I can't count the times that I was up 48 - 72 hours straight. Once, I was up for 100 hours. Later, as a truck driver, it was common for me to go 48 hours without sleep. I can't do that anymore.
did a search here and couldn't find this posted yet.. in today's parade magazine, walter scott's personality parade column:.
q. how does tennis star serena williams justify wearing such sexy clothes when she's a jehovah's witness?-ron ryden, riverview, fla.. a. the winner of 10 grand slam singles titles dresses conservatively when attending kingdom hall services, but there's no religious dress code preventing her from wearing revealing clothes on or off the court.. i'm guessing it was serena or her publicist that provided this response.
i'm doubting recent wts publications or their official website confirm this position.. contact walter scott:.
Once, when I was working as a truck driver, I was in a truck stop on a beautiful Saturday morning. As I was sitting there doing paper work in the driver's seat with the window down, two young (well endowed) ladies approached to talk to me. I was quite confused as both of their necklines were very low. I don't think they realized it, but from my perch I had a COMPLETE view down their shirts. I didn't hear a thing they said, but I did breifly notice the Washtowels in their hands. I said nothing to discourage them, but they left when they realized a wasn't hearing a thing they said.
i saw my first while out on errands today!.
bought a 68 camaro in 1977. paid 700$ taxes, title, registration, inspection & new tires!.
i wish i still had mine.
1975 Fiat X1/9
john 5 :39 ' 40 "you study the scriptures, because you think that in them you will find eternal life.
and these very scriptures speak about me!
yet you are not willing to come to me in order to have life.
What Reniaa, and most people who trip over the trinity, miss is that even though Jesus is ontologically equal with the Father; He is functionally subordinate. Worshipping the Father or Jesus is not an either or proposition. To worship one is to worship the other.
i started this as a new thread because the orignal was getting rather long and distant from the op.
mad dog and i were circulating what, i maintain (or admit) are some fairly specific grounds for starting the discussion.. he was defending a version of (as i understand it): it is unfounded or irrational to accept the theory of evolution as probably true because either the evidence is insufficient compared to what should be observed according to the theory or the evidence observed, while corresponding to the theory, nevertheless is based on unfounded or irrational assumptions.. he is not saying, as i understand it, the following: there exists some evidence which either falsifies the necessary conditions or some other theory which better fits the data.. i was defending and will defend: it is rational to accept the theory of evolution as probably true because the evidence closely corresponds to and is sufficient compared to what should be observed according to the theory and (if we ever get there) it is irrational to reject or postpone judgement of the theory on these grounds.. i'll certainly leave the last half for now, and cut right to the chase in as terse a way possible to allow a likewise pointed rebuttal.. if the theory of evolution were true.... 1. the necessary condition of variation within a population of organisms should be observed.. 2. the necessary condition of a means of heredity should be observed.. 3. the necessary condition of mechanisms os selection should be observed to act on, within and between populations of organisms.. (these conditions, if proven, satisfy that the theory is at least possibly true, but does not constitute grounds to determine rational belief or disbelief in common descent.).
4. there should be evidence observable in the present and derivable through repeatable analytic means therefrom that life has existed on earth for a long time with respect to the life span of any known organism.. 5. any evidence for the existance of past life forms which is observable in the present should by comparative anatomy, geographical location, computational dating and other methods correspond to the prediction of the descent of species from common ancestors.. 6. the current biogeographical distribution of species alive today should be observed to correspond to the theory of common descent and also fit the evidence in (5).. 7. given genetics, the observable evidence in (6, some of 5, some of 1-3) should be verified to match any corresponding prediction derived from the theory.. (these observations, a posteriori, would constitute strong evidence for the conclusion that probably, evolution is true and may or may not constitute logical grounds for rational belief depending on exactly how an opposing position is developed.
Spook,
Thank you for taking the time for writing the above post. It has brought to light a couple of things that I have not been clear on. My schedule is too tight today to allow for the time for me to do your post justice. I will address it in a way that I hope will clarify things.
